Brief Reports

Direct oral anticoagulants: does one dose fit all? Why, when and how testing

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 15 January 2026
691
Views
145
Downloads

Authors

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are commonly prescribed using fixed-dose regimens, based on the assumption of predictable pharmacokinetics and a favorable balance between efficacy and safety. As a result, laboratory assessment is often considered unnecessary in patients receiving DOAC. However, increasing evidence from clinical trials and real-world studies challenges this “one-dose-fits-all” paradigm, demonstrating marked interindividual variability in drug exposure. Importantly, extreme plasma concentrations have been associated with an increased risk of thrombotic events or bleeding complications. This article revisits the role of the clinical laboratory in the management of patients treated with DOAC, clearly distinguishing routine dose adjustment from targeted measurement in selected clinical scenarios. It discusses situations in which laboratory testing may meaningfully support clinical decision-making, as well as practical considerations regarding DOAC measurement and their interference with commonly used hemostatic assays. Overall, a more nuanced, patient-centered use of laboratory testing may improve the safety and effectiveness of DOAC therapy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

1. Huisman MV, Rothman KJ, Paquette M, et al. The changing landscape for stroke prevention in AF: findings from the GLORIA-AF registry phase 2. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;69:777-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.061
2. Boudes PF. The challenges of new drugs benefits and risks analysis: lessons from the ximelagatran FDA Cardiovascular Advisory Committee. Contemp Clin Trials 2006;27:432-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2006.04.005
3. No authors listed. Melagatran/ximelagatran: market withdrawal. Prescrire Int 2006;15:108.
4. Reilly PA, Lehr T, Haertter S, et al. The effect of dabigatran plasma concentrations and patient characteristics on the frequency of ischemic stroke and major bleeding in atrial fibrillation patients: the RE-LY Trial (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy). J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:321-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.104
5. Testa S, Paoletti O, Legnani C, et al. Low drug levels and thrombotic complications in high-risk atrial fibrillation patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants. J Thromb Haemost 2018;16:842-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.14001
6. Siedler G, Macha K, Stoll S, et al. Monitoring of direct oral anticoagulants plasma levels for secondary stroke prevention. J Thromb Haemost 2022;20:1138-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.15677
7. Testa S, Palareti G, Legnani C, et al. Thrombotic events associated with low baseline direct oral anticoagulant levels in atrial fibrillation: the MAS study. Blood Adv 2024;8:1846-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2023012408
8. Palareti G, Testa S, Legnani C, et al. More early bleeds associated with high baseline direct oral anticoagulant levels in atrial fibrillation: the MAS study. Blood Adv 2024;8:4913-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013126
9. Godino C, Mazza R, Gaspardone C, et al. Plasma levels measurement of the 4 direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation at the time of acute thromboembolic and bleeding events. J Thromb Haemost 2025;23:3515-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtha.2025.06.031
10. Testa S, Tripodi A, Legnani C, et al. Plasma levels of direct oral anticoagulants in real life patients with atrial fibrillation: Results observed in four anticoagulation clinics. Thromb Res 2016;137:178-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2015.12.001
11. Pollack CV Jr, Reilly PA, Eikelboom J, et al. Idarucizumab for dabigatran reversal. N Engl J Med 2015;373:511-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1502000
12. Siegal DM, Curnutte JT, Connolly SJ, et al. Andexanet alfa for the reversal of factor Xa inhibitor activity. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2413-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1510991
13. Testa S, Legnani C, Tripodi A, et al. Poor comparability of coagulation screening test with specific measurement in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants: results from a multicenter/multiplatform study. J Thromb Haemost 2016;14:2194-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.13486
14. Tripodi A, Scalambrino E, Chantarangkul V, et al. Impact of a commercially available DOAC absorbent on two integrated procedures for lupus anticoagulant detection. Thromb Res 2021;204:32-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2021.06.001

CRediT authorship contribution

Armando Tripodi: conceptualization, writing- reviewing and editing.

Armando Tripodi, IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Foundation, Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, Milan

Fondazione Luigi Villa, Milan, Italy

How to Cite



1.
Tripodi A. Direct oral anticoagulants: does one dose fit all? Why, when and how testing. Bleeding Thromb Vascul Biol [Internet]. 2026 Jan. 15 [cited 2026 Mar. 1];5(1). Available from: https://www.btvb.org/btvb/article/view/418