PO56 | Safety of anticoagulant treatment in patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis and history of portal hypertension-related bleeding

R. Talerico¹, S. Pellegrino¹, A. Plessier², F.R. Ponziani³, A. Porfidia¹, F. Landi¹, A. Gasbarrini³, R. Pola¹, F. Santopaolo³ | ¹Department of Geriatric, Orthopedic, and Rheumatologic Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; ²Université de Paris, AP-HP, C, DMU DIGEST, Centre de Référence des Maladies Vasculaires du Foie, FILFOIE, ERN RARE-LIVE. Centre de recherche sur l’inflammation, Inserm, Paris, France; ³Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy

Background and Aims: Splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) can be associated to liver cirrhosis, or prothrombotic conditions, including myeloproliferative disorders, intra-abdominal inflammation, solid cancers, or surgery. While anticoagulation therapy improves outcomes in non-cirrhotic patients and reduces all-cause mortality in cirrhotic populations, its safety in patients with a history of portal hypertension (PH)-related bleeding is less clear. This systematic review examines the impact of anticoagulant therapy on re-bleeding risk in SVT patients with a history of PH-related bleeding.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus was performed for studies published up to September 2024. Studies were included if they compared SVT patients with a history of PH-related bleeding receiving anticoagulant therapy versus those not receiving anticoagulants. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of PH-related re-bleedings.

Results: Of 2,853 identified studies, five (186 participants) met the inclusion criteria: two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three observational studies. The cumulative incidence of PH-related re-bleeding was significantly lower in the anticoagulant group at 17.10% [95% CI 17.02, 17.19] compared to the control group at 40.00% [95% CI 39.90, 40.09]. The overall odds ratio (OR) from observational studies was 0.15 [95% CI 0.04, 0.52], indicating a reduced bleeding risk, while the OR from RCTs was 0.84 [95% CI 0.31, 2.32], showing a non-significant trend.

Conclusions: Anticoagulant therapy may reduce re-bleeding risk in SVT patients with a history of PH-related bleeding, but further high-quality studies are needed.