Original Articles
Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): In memory of Armando D’Angelo

Impact of CYP2C19 loss-of-function variants on outcomes in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: rationale and study design of the WOEST-3 genetic substudy

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 28 August 2026
0
Views
0
Downloads

Authors

Background: The impact of CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) variants on clopidogrel efficacy in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains uncertain. While clopidogrel is the preferred P2Y12 inhibitor in combination with oral anticoagulants, approximately one-third of patients carry CYP2C19 LOF alleles, known to reduce platelet inhibition and increase ischemic risk.

Methods: The WOEST-3 genetic substudy is an observational pharmacogenetic investigation embedded within the randomized WOEST-3 trial (NCT04436978). Patients with AF undergoing PCI and providing additional consent for genetic testing will be included. CYP2C19 *2, *3, *4, *8 and *35 genotypes will be determined using both Genedrive® (Genedrive Diagnostics Ltd, Manchester, UK) point-of-care and laboratory-based assays. Genetic results will remain blinded to investigators and clinicians to avoid treatment bias. The primary endpoint is a 6-month composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism, and stent thrombosis. Approximately 30% of patients are anticipated to carry CYP2C19 LOF alleles. The study will determine whether concomitant direct oral anticoagulants therapy mitigates the impact of reduced clopidogrel activation in these carriers or whether genetic variability continues to confer excess ischemic risk.

Conclusions: This protocol paper describes the rationale and design of a genetic substudy aimed at clarifying the prognostic relevance of CYP2C19 genotype in AF patients undergoing PCI and informing the design of future genotype-guided antithrombotic trials.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

1. Jiang XL, Samant S, Lesko LJ, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel. Clin Pharmacokinet 2015;54:147-66.
2. Li X, Liu Y, Zhang Y, et al. Clopidogrel-associated genetic variants on inhibition of platelet activity and clinical outcome for acute coronary syndrome patients. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2019;124:84-93.
3. van den Heuvel L, van der Leeuw J, van Dijk EJ, et al. The frequency of CYP2C19 loss-of-function variants in patients with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack in the Dutch population. Cerebrovasc Dis 2023;52:700-5.
4. Magavern EF, Squire IB, Hall AS, et al. CYP2C19 genotype prevalence and association with recurrent myocardial infarction in British-South Asians treated with clopidogrel. JACC Adv 2023;2:100465.
5. Vidović S, Savić-Radojević A, Plješa-Ercegovac M, et al. Prevalence of five pharmacologically most important CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 allelic variants in the population from the Republic of Srpska in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 2021;72:129-34.
6. Carano F, De Iudicibus S, Stocco G, et al. Genetic variability of CYP2D6, CYP2B6, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 genes across the Italian Peninsula. Ann Hum Biol 2018;45:66-71.
7. Cavallari LH, Lee CR, Beitelshees AL, et al. Multisite investigation of outcomes with implementation of CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2018;11:181-91.
8. Lee CR, Luzum JA, Sangkuhl K, et al. Clinical outcomes and sustainability of using CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ Genom Precis Med 2018;11:e002069.
9. Shen DL, Wang B, Bai J, et al. Clinical value of CYP2C19 genetic testing for guiding the antiplatelet therapy in a Chinese population. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2016;67:232-6.
10. Janssen PWA, Bergmeijer TO, Ten Berg JM, et al. Tailored P2Y12 inhibitor treatment in patients undergoing non-urgent PCI—the POPular Risk Score study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2019;75:1201-10.
11. Bergmeijer TO, Janssen PWA, Schipper JC, et al. CYP2C19 genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients—rationale and design of the POPular Genetics study. Am Heart J 2014;168:16-22.
12. De Caterina R, Husted S, Wallentin L, et al. Great debate: triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing coronary stenting should be limited to 1 week. Eur Heart J 2022;43:3512-27.
13. Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2024;13:55-161.
14. Desai A, Gupta A, Patel P, et al. Risk of stroke vs intracerebral hemorrhage in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing dual vs triple antithrombotic therapy. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2021;30:105654.
15. Lopes RD, Heizer G, Aronson R, et al. Antithrombotic therapy after acute coronary syndrome or PCI in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2019;380:1509-24.
16. Cannon CP, Bhatt DL, Oldgren J, et al. Dual antithrombotic therapy with dabigatran after PCI in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1513-24.
17. Vranckx P, Valgimigli M, Eckardt L, et al. Edoxaban-based versus vitamin K antagonist-based antithrombotic regimen after successful coronary stenting in patients with atrial fibrillation (ENTRUST-AF PCI): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial. Lancet 2019;394:1335-43.
18. Gibson CM, Mehran R, Bode C, et al. Prevention of bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI. N Engl J Med 2016;375:2423-34.
19. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2019;41:407-47.
20. Verburg A, Geisler T, Ten Berg JM, et al. Temporary omission of oral anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: rationale and design of the WOEST-3 randomised trial. EuroIntervention 2024;20:e898-e904.
21. Pereira NL, Rihal CS, So D, et al. CYP2C19 genetic testing for oral P2Y12 inhibitor therapy: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2024;149.
22. Mega JL, Simon T, Collet JP, et al. Reduced-function CYP2C19 genotype and risk of adverse clinical outcomes among patients treated with clopidogrel predominantly for PCI: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2010;304:1821-30.
23. Burke KA, Tuteja S, Zhao H, et al. Development and validation of a rapid point-of-care CYP2C19 genotyping platform. J Mol Diagn 2025;27:209-15.
24. Chan NC, Eikelboom JW, Weitz JI. Evolving treatments for arterial and venous thrombosis. Circ Res 2016;118:1409-24.
25. Bahit MC, Lopes RD, Wojdyla DM, et al. Apixaban or warfarin and aspirin or placebo after acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with atrial fibrillation and prior stroke: a post hoc analysis from the AUGUSTUS trial. JAMA Cardiol 2022;7:682-9.
26. Petrović J, Pešić V, Lauschke VM. Frequencies of clinically important CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 alleles are graded across Europe. Eur J Hum Genet 2020;28:88-94.
27. Notarangelo FM, Maglietta G, Bevilacqua P, et al. Pharmacogenomic approach to selecting antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes: the PHARMCLO trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;71:1869-77.
28. Heestermans M, Verhamme P, Weitz JI, et al. Anticoagulants: a short history, their mechanism of action, pharmacology, and indications. Cells 2022;11:3210.
29. Schwarb H, Tsakiris DA. New direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) and their use today. Dent J (Basel) 2016;4:5.
30. Pereira NL, Farkouh ME, So D, et al. Effect of CYP2C19 genotype on ischemic outcomes during oral P2Y12 inhibitor therapy: a meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2021;14:739-50.
31. Ingraham BS, Tuteja S, Mega JL, et al. Genetic-guided oral P2Y12 inhibitor selection and cumulative ischemic events after percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2023;16:816-25.
32. Parcha V, Kalra R, Arora P, et al. Genotype-guided P2Y12 inhibitor therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: a Bayesian analysis. Circ Genom Precis Med 2021;14:e003353.

CRediT authorship contribution

All the authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 

Supporting Agencies

provided by an unrestricted grant to the St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands by Daiichi Sankyo Europe. Genotyping was provided by Genedrive® (Manchester, United Kingdom), the Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center (Rotterdam, the Netherlands), and the Azienda Ospedaliero–Universitaria Pisana (Pisa, Italy).

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author. 

How to Cite



1.
Chiusolo S, Verburg A, Morizzo C, Van Schaik RH, Matic M, Coenen MJ, et al. Impact of CYP2C19 loss-of-function variants on outcomes in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: rationale and study design of the WOEST-3 genetic substudy. Bleeding Thromb Vasc Biol [Internet]. 2026 Aug. 28 [cited 2026 Aug. 28];5(3). Available from: https://www.btvb.org/btvb/article/view/421

Most read articles by the same author(s)