Pathways for lower extremity superficial vein thrombosis management in an academic medical center

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
There is currently no established management pathway for lower extremity superficial vein thrombosis (SVT), leading to significant uncertainty among front-line providers. This study aimed to assess prescribing practices and patient outcomes for the initial treatment of lower extremity SVT. This descriptive retrospective cohort study in a single center included consecutive patients with radiographically diagnosed acute lower extremity isolated SVT between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2021. Exclusions were chronic SVT, concomitant deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, required anticoagulation for another indication, or no documented SVT treatment plan. This 6-year study included 265 patients. The majority received conservative therapy as the SVT management strategy (n=188, 70.9%), while 23% (n=61) received anticoagulation therapy. Few patients received no treatment (n=13, 4.9%) or surgery (n=3, 1.1%). The most common strategy in those utilizing anticoagulation was a VTE treatment-dose DOAC, but the duration varied considerably (11.5% 30 days or less, 37.7% 31-45 days, 21.3% for 46-90 days, and 24.6% >90 days). Ninety-day progression to VTE occurred in 8 patients (3.1%, 2 in the anticoagulation therapy group and 6 in the conservative therapy group). Bleeding occurred in 6 patients (2.3%, 4 in the conservative therapy group and 2 in the anticoagulation group). Over a six-year period, there were varying pathways of managing acute lower extremity SVT without a concerning signal in adverse events with any single treatment approach. Future study should focus on which patients benefit from anticoagulation therapy vs conservative therapy and clarifying the optimal anticoagulation treatment intensity and duration.
Edited by
this study was approved by the University of Utah Institutional Review BoardHow to Cite

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.