Editorials
Vol. 2 No. 3 (2023)
Reducing the risks of nuclear war - The role of health professionals
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 21 August 2023
1009
Views
204
Downloads
Authors
In January 2023, the Science and Security Board of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists moved the hands of the Doomsday Clock forward to 90 seconds before midnight, reflecting the growing risk of nuclear war. In August 2022, the UN Secretary-General António Guterres warned that the world is now in “a time of nuclear danger not seen since the height of the Cold War.” The danger has been underlined by growing tensions between many nuclear armed states [...].
Note: this Editorial is being published simultaneously in multiple journals. For the full list of journals see: https://www.bmj.com/content/full-list-authors-and-signatories-nuclear-risk-editorial-august-2023.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Citations
Science and Security Board, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. A time of unprecedented danger: it is 90 seconds to midnight. 2023 Doomsday Clock Statement. January 24, 2023. Accessed June 1, 2023. Available from: https://thebulletin.org/doomsday-clock/current-time/
United Nations. Future generations counting on our commitment to step back from abyss, lift cloud of nuclear annihilation for good, secretary-general tells review conference. Press release SG/SM/21394. August 1, 2022. Accessed July 10, 2023. Available from: https://press.un.org/en/2022/sgsm21394.doc.htm
Tollefson J. Is nuclear war more likely after Russia’s suspension of the New START treaty? Nature 2023;615:386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00679-w
United Nations. Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). May 2-27, 2005. Accessed June 2, 2023. Available from: https://www.un.org/en/conf/npt/2005/npttreaty.html
Mukhatzhanova G. 10th NPT Review Conference: why it was doomed and how it almost succeeded. Arms Control Association. October 2022. Accessed June 2, 2023. Available from: https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2022-10/features/10th-npt-review-conference-why-doomed-almost-succeeded
Lewis P, Pelopidas B, Williams H. Too close for comfort, cases of near nuclear use and options for policy. Chatham House Report. April 2014. Accessed June 1, 2023. Available from: https://www.chathamhouse.org/2014/04/too-close-comfort-cases-near-nuclear-use-and-options-policy
Bivens M. Nuclear famine. IPPNW. August 2022. Accessed June 1, 2023. Available from: https://www.ippnw.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/ENGLISH-Nuclear-Famine-Report-Final-bleed-marks.pdf
Xia L, Robock A, Scherrer K, et al. Global food insecurity and famine from reduced crop, marine fishery and livestock production due to climate disruption from nuclear war soot injection. Nat Food 2022;3:586-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00573-0
Helfand I, Lewis P, Haines A. Reducing the risks of nuclear war to humanity. Lancet. 2022;399:1097-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00422-6
The Nobel Prize. International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War—facts. 1985. Accessed June 1, 2023. Available from: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/peace/1985/physicians/facts/
UN Office for Disarmament Affairs. Treaties Database. Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons: status of the Treaty. January 2021. Accessed June 2, 2023. https://treaties.unoda.org/t/tpnw
Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation. No first use: frequently asked questions. Accessed June 2, 2023. Available from: https://armscontrolcenter.org/issues/no-first-use/no-first-use-frequently-asked-questions/
How to Cite
1.
Abbasi K, Ali P, Barbour V, Bibbins-Domingo K, Olde Rikkert MG, Haines A, et al. Reducing the risks of nuclear war - The role of health professionals. Bleeding Thromb Vascul Biol [Internet]. 2023 Aug. 21 [cited 2025 Nov. 8];2(3). Available from: https://www.btvb.org/btvb/article/view/94
Copyright (c) 2023 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Share
Similar Articles
- PO77 | The clinical awareness of mixing test interpretation in the era of complex reporting algorithm: do we forget the origins? , Bleeding, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology: Vol. 4 No. s1 (2025)
- CO07 | Real word management of anticoagulant therapy in brain metastasis: moving toward a multidisciplinary approach in complex cases , Bleeding, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology: Vol. 4 No. s1 (2025)
- CO14 | Inflammation and fibrinolysis biomarkers as predictors of cancer risk in healthy subjects: results from the hypercan study , Bleeding, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology: Vol. 4 No. s1 (2025)
- Loredana Bury, Alessio Branchini, Francesco Bernardi, Paolo Gresele, Platelet transcriptomic changes in myocardial infarction are sex and clinical subtype-related: a step forward towards precision medicine? , Bleeding, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology: Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025)
- Marco Marietta, Giancarlo Castaman, Comments on “Safe and effective anticoagulation use: case studies in anticoagulation stewardship” , Bleeding, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology: Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025)
Previous
71-75 of 75
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
