Addressing some challenges of congenital fibrinogen disorders in 2023 and beyond

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Congenital fibrinogen disorders (CFD) include several types and subtypes of fibrinogen deficiency, resulting from monoallelic or biallelic mutations in one of the three fibrinogen genes. While it is relatively easy to make an accurate diagnosis based on activity and antigen levels of fibrinogen and genotype, prediction of the clinical phenotype is challenging. Even among patients with the same genotype, the clinical features are heterogeneous and unpredictable. The development of next-generation sequencing rises the possibility to integrate genetic modifiers to explain the subtle relationship between genotype and clinical phenotype. A recent development in integrative hemostasis assays can also help in the determination of patients at risk of bleeding or thrombosis. In this short review, we go through these topics and explain why CFD could be considered an oligogenic rather than a monogenic disease.
How to Cite

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.